Myocardial rupture is the most feared and often lethal complication of acute MI. It was a potential diagnosis for this patient who presented with sinus tachycardia, ST-segment elevation from V1 to V4, II, III, and aVF with associated Q waves. Follow the workup and outcome here.
Dr Gonzalez is a resident and Dr Castillo is an attending physician in the department of medicine, cardiology division, at Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York. Dr Ramkissoon is a cardiovascular fellow in the department of medicine at SUNY Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York.
A 53-year-old man with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department complaining of a week-long history of intermittent retrosternal chest discomfort. The pain had worsened 8 hours before admission. Chest pain was of 4/10 in severity and was associated with dyspnea and palpitations.
Admission blood pressure was 180/106 mm Hg; pulse, 121 beats/min; respiration rate, 22 breaths/min. There was no significant jugular venous distention, but bilateral crackles were noted in both lungs.
The ECG revealed sinus tachycardia and ST segment elevation from V1 to V4, II, III, and aVF with associated Q waves. These findings were consistent with a recent acute anterior wall ST-segment elevation MI (Figure 1).
The patient had no history of tobacco addiction, alcohol consumption, or illicit drug use. Pertinent admission laboratory tests showed that levels of troponin, creatinine, electrolytes, and hemoglobin were within normal limits.
Emergent cardiac catheterization revealed total thrombotic occlusion of the mid left anterior descending coronary artery (Figure 2A and 2C). The remaining coronary arteries revealed only luminal irregularities; left ventriculography showed a severely decreased left ventricular ejection fraction of about 15%. Successful manual thrombectomy followed by bare metal stenting was performed (Figure 2B and 2D).
Transthoracic echocardiogram (TEE) confirmed the severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and showed an apical dilatation of the left ventricle, with small, mobile, intraventricular densities that suggested loose myocardial tissue at the margins of the anterior and septal walls. This suggested a left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) or a pseudoaneurysm (PA) (Figure 3). Contrast echocardiography and cardiac CT angiography failed to distinguish between an LVA and a PA. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was therefore requested: this confirmed an LVA (Figure 4) with myocardial tissue hanging in the LV cavity, consistent with intramyocardial dissection of the LV anterior, septal, and apical myocardial walls (Figure 5).
The patient was discharged after 7 days of an uneventful hospitalization course, during which he was treated with prophylactic anticoagulation and afterload reducing agents. He was followed up in the outpatient clinic at 30 days and 3 months without re-hospitalization and with compensated, stable congestive heart failure.
Myocardial rupture is the most feared and often lethal complication of acute MI.¹ Free-wall rupture usually occurs 3 to 6 days after MI and is mostly associated with anterior wall MI. Rupturing of the free wall of the infarcted ventricle is relatively common, and is found in 15% to 25% of patients who died of MI.2-4 Myocardial rupture is found in fewer than 1% of living patients with an acute MI.5
Incomplete rupture is a relatively uncommon type of free-wall rupture, found in 10% to 15% of total free-wall ruptures.6
It is thought that the infarcted myocardium wall is made weak in part by activation of metalloproteinases, which degrade the myocardial matrix. Structural weakness associated with increased intracavitary pressure predisposes the myocardial wall to rupture.
Smaller transmural MIs with conserved myocardial contractility are more prone to rupture than bigger transmural MIs, with decreased myocardial contractility. This could be related to the higher intracavitary pressure reached during systole in patients with preserved ejection fraction.7
The absence of collateral blood flow and size of the infarct area are important determinants of the likelihood of myocardial rupture. No previous history of angina or MI and ST-segment elevation or Q-wave development on the initial ECG increase the likelihood of free-wall rupture, as seen in our patient. Other risk factors include anterior wall infarct; increased age; female sex; early ambulation; and recent use of thrombolytics, corticosteroids, and NSAIDs. Thrombolytic therapy administered more than 11 hours after the onset of symptoms may increase the risk of cardiac rupture. In contrast, if thrombolysis is administrated within 6 to 7 hours of symptoms onset, risk is reduced. Beta-blockers, percutaneous coronary intervention, and left ventricular hypertrophy also reduce the risk of free-wall rupture.8,9
Cardiac hypertrophy may have protected our patient from complete free-wall rupture. The lack of early reperfusion therapy and medical treatment predisposed him to the development of left ventricular aneurysm, so that the myocardium of the anterior and septal wall split in half: the more inner part of the wall hung into the ventricular cavity, which resulted in an incomplete rupture of the LV myocardial wall and the dissection of the myocardium in the infarcted area
It was difficult to differentiate if the apical dilatation was a true LVA or PA on the initial TTE. Pseudoaneurysms are only contained by adherent pericardium: these have a 30% to 45% risk of rupture, and a mortality rate of 50% when treated medically. Hence, surgery is the preferred treatment option. With current techniques, perioperative mortality is less than 10%.10
In comparison LVA is a well-delineated, thin, scarred or fibrotic wall, which rarely ruptures. Hence, medical therapy is the preferred option. Affected patients are at risk for heart failure and arrhythmia, however.
While TTE has it advantages (low cost and readily available) over CMR, the sensitivity to diagnosis of subacute free-wall rupture is about 70%.11 Our patient was hemodynamically stable and did not develop any arrhythmias; hence it was safe to proceed with CMR for an accurate diagnosis. CMR can be used to differentiate a true LVA from a PA. It is used to evaluate flow disturbances between the cavity, LV, and pericardium.12
In summary, we present a case in which an acute MI led to intramyocardial dissection and workup for LVA vs PA. CMR is the definitive imaging modality to evaluate clinically stable patients with echo findings that suggest possible free-wall rupture. It is hoped that with early reperfusion therapy, the incidence of this feared complication will continue to decrease.
Related Content:Cardiovascular Disease