ABSTRACT: Effective smoking cessation strategies typically encompass the use of some pharmacotherapy with counseling by physicians. Give the Fagerstrom test to patients who want to quit smoking to determine their degree of nicotine dependence. For low-nicotine-dependent smokers, the use of 1 smoking cessation product for a short period has proved successful; for high-dependence smokers, a combination of products, such as nicotine gum and a nicotine patch, can be used. Other available smoking cessation products are the nicotine nasal spray, the nicotine inhaler, and sustained-release bupropion. Increasing the dose or duration of nicotine gum and patch has improved abstinence rates among high- dependence smokers. Quit rates have also been shown to increase with the dose of bupropion.
Smoking accounts for more than 400,000 (approximately 1 of every 5) deaths each year in the United States and is the most common cause of preventable disease.1,2 Smoking is a risk factor for the 4 leading causes of death: heart disease, cancer, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).3 Currently, 24% of the US adult population are smokers.4
Approximately one third to half of all cigarette smokers will die because of their smoking.5 The total mortality rate among current smokers is twice that of persons who never smoked.6 It is estimated that 70% of smokers visit a physician each year; however, only half report ever being advised to quit smoking by their physician.7-9
The main obstacles to quitting smoking are nicotine addiction and withdrawal symptoms. Pharmacotherapy offers assistance for patients who want to quit smoking. Recent developments in the pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation has led the US Public Health Service to update the previous guidelines of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR).7,8 In this article, I will review the current recommended methods used for smoking cessation and certain issues regarding pharmacotherapy.
BENEFITS OF SMOKING CESSATION
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States.3 The risk of developing this disease can be reduced by half after 1 year of smoking cessation, and after 2 years, the risk becomes equal to that of persons who never smoked.10 After 5 years or more of smoking abstinence, the mortality rate from CAD decreases to almost the level for persons who never smoked.11 After 10 to 14 years of smoking cessation, the mortality risk decreases to that of persons who never smoked.12
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States, and COPD is the fourth leading cause of death overall.3 Smoking can accelerate the normal age-related rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, which can revert to a normal rate of decline with smoking cessation.13,14 The risk of lung cancer in former smokers progressively decreases with the number of years of abstinence but always remains higher than that in patients who never smoked.15
Nicotine dependence disorder has been defined as a form of substance abuse that can lead to clinically important impairment or distress.16 Fagerstrom proposed a questionnaire to determine the degree of nicotine dependence.17,18 The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence places significant importance on "time to the first cigarette of the day."17,18
Nicotine has a relatively short half-life, and smokers may experience significant discomfort on waking unless they quickly have their first cigarette.19 However, only the number of cigarettes smoked per day has been shown to correlate with the degree of nicotine dependence.20 Therefore, the use of a brief Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence has been recommended (Table 1).21
The signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal include craving for tobacco, irritability, anxiety, difficulty in concentrating, restlessness, insomnia, and increased hunger.22 These signs and symptoms were confirmed in a study of 630 smokers who quit smoking without pharmacologic aid.23 The self-reported and observer-rated signs and symptoms were assessed precessation and postcessation.
The investigators found that anxiety, difficulty in concentrating, irritability, restlessness, and nocturnal awakening returned to precessation levels by 30 days. Hunger symptoms, however, remained elevated at 30 days postcessation.23
In a study conducted by Gritz and colleagues24 of 554 patients who tried to quit smoking without assistance, 87% reported withdrawal symptoms during the first week of follow-up, with restlessness and eating more than usual being the most common symptoms.
METHODS OF SMOKING CESSATION
In 1996, the AHCPR recommended a 5-step approach known as the 5 A's (Table 2).25
Ask about smoking.
Advise smokers to stop.
Assess the patient's willingness to stop.
Assist patients who are willing to stop.
Arrange close follow-up.
Because of recent developments in the pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, the US Public Health Service updated the practice guidelines for treating tobacco use and dependence and endorsed the use of this 5-step approach.7,8
The 5 A's outline is a brief clinical intervention that encompasses advice and counseling as major steps in smoking cessation.7,8 Physician communication about the benefits of smoking cessation and encouragement to quit have proved to be successful. Unfortunately, fewer than half of smokers report that they have ever been advised by their physician to quit smoking.9
The impact of even brief, 3- to 5-minute, counseling on smoking cessation has been demonstrated.26,27 Counseling should not be limited to the outpatient setting. In a study evaluating the effects of counseling on smoking cessation among 74 hospitalized patients with COPD, the counseled group had higher quit rates at 6 months' follow-up.28 All patients were advised to quit smoking, and half were provided with a self-help manual and brief, 15- to 20-minute, counseling sessions. A total of 58 patients were available for follow-up at 6 months. Quit rates at 6 months' follow-up were 33% for the counseled group and 21% for the control group.
The effects of counseling can be extended through the use of the telephone. In a study of 233 smokers, Wadland and colleagues29 found that 6 sessions of telephone counseling enhanced smoking cessation rates (21% for the telephone-counseled group vs 8% for the group that received usual care).
The FDA has approved 5 products for smoking cessation, including nicotine gum; nicotine transdermal patch; nicotine nasal spray; nicotine inhaler; and a nonnicotine agent, sustained-release bupropion.30,31 The US Public Health Service recommends that all smokers, with the exception of women who are pregnant or breast-feeding, adolescents, and those with medical contraindications, should consider pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation.7,8 Medical contraindications include severe reactive airways disease in patients considering nicotine nasal spray.7,8 Pregnant smokers should first be encouraged to quit without pharmacologic aid.7,8
Cost and lack of insurance coverage may be a barrier for some patients in obtaining pharmacologic aid for smoking cessation. The Box lists the typical costs of drug therapy.
Nicotine gum. Nicotine polacrilex gum is available over the counter in 2- and 4-mg strengths. The gum can be chewed every 1 to 2 hours for a maximum of 60 mg/d.30 The typical dose is 10 pieces per day. The recommended duration of therapy is 1 to 3 months.7,8
The gum should be chewed slowly until a peppery, minty taste becomes apparent and then "parked" between the cheek and gum to facilitate nicotine absorption. Chewing is resumed when the taste fades, and the "chew/park" steps should be repeated until the taste completely fades. Approximately 50% of the nicotine is released in the mouth and is absorbed through the mucosa. The gum should be chewed and parked for about 30 minutes.7,8 Common side effects of nicotine gum include jaw ache and dyspepsia.30
One study found an increased cessation rate with the 4-mg dose compared with the 2-mg dose for high-dependence smokers, but not for low-dependence smokers.32 The participants were classified as high-nicotine-dependent or low-nicotine-dependent based on the Fagerstrom test. They were randomly assigned to receive placebo or 2- or 4-mg nicotine gum.
Of the 608 persons, 92 were abstinent at 1 year. One-year quit rates for the low-nicotine-dependent smokers were as follows: 11% for placebo, 18% for 2-mg gum, and 17% for 4-mg gum. One-year quit rates for the high-nicotine-dependent smokers were as follows: 8% for placebo, 20% for 2-mg gum, and 26% for 4-mg gum.
Nicotine patch. There are 3 major brands of nicotine patch. Generic nicotine patches are now available also. Habitrol and Nicoderm CQ are intended for 24-hour use. The patches are available in 21-, 14-, and 7-mg doses. The dose can be progressively weaned over 2 to 4 months.7,8 The recommended taper is 21 mg for 4 weeks, then 14 mg for 2 weeks, then 7 mg for 2 weeks. The Nicotrol patch is intended for 16-hour daytime use and should be removed before bedtime. The patch is available as a 15-mg dose. The recommended duration of treatment is 6 weeks.30
The nicotine patch should be applied to a clean hairless area of the skin. A common side effect of the patch is skin irritation, such as mild itching or burning, which can be reduced by rotating the patch site.31
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial reported 1-year quit rates of 19% for nicotine patch versus 12% for placebo patch.33 A meta-analysis of 17 studies involving a variety of nicotine patches showed abstinence rates at 6 months of 22% for the treatment group compared with 9% for the group that received the placebo patch.34 In a study evaluating the efficacy of varying doses of nicotine patch, patients assigned to the 21-mg patch had higher abstinence rates at long-term follow-up.35 The self-reported continuous quit rates at 48 months of follow-up were 20% for the 21-mg patch, 10% for the 14-mg patch, 12% for the 7-mg patch, and 7% for the placebo patch.
In another study, a 24-hour transdermal nicotine patch yielded better control of morning craving symptoms than a 16-hour patch. The 24-hour patch also yielded longer abstinence rates.36
Two separate randomized controlled trials demonstrated that a 44 mg/d dose of nicotine patch therapy appears to be safe and effective for use in smokers who have high nicotine dependence.37,38
The use of nicotine patches combined with counseling treatments has been shown to increase quit rates.39
Another study by Paoletti and colleagues40 found that patients with high cotinine levels at baseline had lower cessation rates with the use of nicotine patch therapy. Patients with low baseline cotinine levels (less than 250 ng/mL) had higher cessation rates when compared with patients who had baseline cotinine levels of greater than 250 ng/mL.40 Thus, determination of baseline plasma cotinine levels may be helpful in identifying smokers who may have difficulty with smoking cessation.
Nicotine nasal spray. This spray delivers nicotine more rapidly than the gum or the patch.41 It is available by prescription in a quantity of 10 mL. Each spray of 0.05 mL delivers 0.5 mg of nicotine.30 The dose may be titrated up to a maximum of 40 mg/d.30
The recommended dosage is 1 or 2 sprays every hour for 6 to 8 weeks. The minimum recommended treatment is 8 doses per day, with a recommended duration of 3 to 6 months.7,8 Patients should not exceed 5 sprays per hour or 40 sprays per day. Tapering of doses in the subsequent 4 to 6 weeks is optimal for avoiding withdrawal symptoms. Side effects often reported from nicotine nasal spray include nasal irritation, rhinorrhea, throat irritation, sneezing, and coughing.31
The results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed that 32% of patients who used active spray were abstinent at 6 months compared with 12% who received the placebo spray.42 The abstinence rates at 1 year of follow-up were 26% for the group that received active spray and 10% for the group that received placebo spray.
Nicotine inhaler. The inhaler is available by prescription and consists of a mouthpiece and a plastic cartridge that contains 4 mg of nicotine. Approximately 80 inhalations are needed to equal the amount of nicotine obtained from 1 cigarette.30 Common side effects include throat irritation and coughing.31 The recommended dosage is 6 to 16 cartridges per day for 6 to 12 weeks, with tapering over the subsequent 3 months.7,8 The vapor should not be inhaled deeply into the lungs because the nicotine is primarily absorbed through the oral cavity, rather than through the lungs.21
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 247 smokers, abstinence rates of 28% were reported for the nicotine inhaler group and 18% for the placebo group at 1 year of follow-up.43 Another double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that the inhaler is useful for short-term smoking cessation with some potential for long-term cessation.44 The respective cessation rates for the active inhaler and placebo groups were 46% versus 28% at 1 week, 24% versus 10% at 3 months, and 13% versus 8% at 1 year of follow-up.
Bupropion. This drug is recommended as a first-line agent by the US Public Health Services guidelines. The recommended dosage is 150 mg once daily for 3 days, then 150 mg twice daily for up to 12 weeks.30 The quit date should be set 1 to 2 weeks after initiating therapy. Common side effects include dry mouth, agitation, insomnia, headaches, and dizziness. Bupropion is contraindicated in patients with seizure disorder.45
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the quit rates increased with the dose of bupropion.46 The quit rates at 7 weeks' follow-up were 19% for the placebo group, 29% for the 100-mg group, 39% for the 150-mg group, and 44% for the 300-mg group. The 1-year abstinence rates were 12% for the placebo group, 20% for the 100-mg group, 23% for the 150-mg group, and 23% for the 300-mg group.46
EFFICACY OF NICOTINE REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS
A comparative trial evaluating the efficacy of the 4 types of nicotine replacement products found no significant difference in rates of abstinence.47 The continuous abstinence rates at 12 weeks' follow-up were 20% for gum, 21% for patch, 24% for spray, and 24% for inhaler.
A study evaluating whether smokers' preference for a nicotine replacement product correlated with abstinence rates found no difference at 15 weeks' follow-up.48 Participants were allowed to rank their preference among gum, patch, nasal spray, and inhaler. The heavier smokers preferred the spray or inhaler, but the patch was the most preferred product overall. There was no significant difference in cessation rates for smokers who received their preferred product. The overall continuous abstinence rates at 15 weeks' follow-up were 23% for gum, 23% for patch, 23% for spray, and 28% for inhaler.
PATIENTS WITH CAD
There has been concern about the safety of nicotine replacement in patients with cardiovascular disease. In a study by Joseph and colleagues,49 584 patients with cardiovascular disease were randomized to receive a 10-week course of transdermal nicotine or transdermal placebo. Primary end points after 14 weeks of follow-up included death; myocardial infarction; cardiac arrest; and admission to the hospital for angina, arrhythmia, or congestive heart failure. This study failed to show a significant increase in cardiovascular events for patients receiving nicotine replacement therapy.49
In a similar study, 156 patients with CAD who smoked at least 1 pack of cigarettes per day were randomized to receive transdermal nicotine or transdermal placebo.50 After 5 weeks' follow-up, the study failed to show any significant difference in the rate of cardiac events. Thus, nicotine replacement therapy is safe in smokers with CAD.
In one double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that evaluated bupropion, nicotine patch, and combined bupropion and nicotine patch, combination therapy was superior to both therapies alone and placebo. Quit rates were 16% for placebo, 16% for bupropion, 30% for nicotine patch, and 36% for combined bupropion and nicotine patch at 1 year of follow-up.51
Another double-blind, placebo-controlled study found higher abstinence rates for persons who received both nicotine patch and nicotine gum compared with those who received nicotine patch and placebo gum.52
Nicotine nasal spray delivers nicotine at a much faster rate than any other nicotine replacement product (for example, peak plasma concentrations are achieved at a much faster rate, usually less than 10 minutes). Blondal and colleagues53 randomized 237 smokers to receive either nicotine patch and spray or patch and placebo spray and found that 1-year cessation rates were better for the patients who received the combined therapy.
REFERENCES1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost-United States, 1984. MMWR. 1987;36:693-697.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost-United States, 1988. MMWR. 1991; 40:69-71.
3. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270:2207-2212.
4. Cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 1998. MMWR. 2000;49:881-884.
5. Doll R, Peto R. Mortality in relation to smoking: 20 years' observations on male British doctors. Br Med J. 1976;2:1525-1536.
6. LaCroix AZ, Lang J, Scherr P, et al. Smoking and mortality among older men and women in three communities. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1619-1625.
7. The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guideline Panel, Staff, and Consortium Representatives. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: a US Public Health Service report. JAMA. 2000;283:3244-3254.
8. Fiore MC. US public health service clinical practice guideline: treating tobacco use and dependence. Respir Care. 2000;45:1200-1262.
9. Frank E, Winkleby MA, Altman DG, et al. Predictors of physician's smoking cessation advice. JAMA. 1991;266:3139-3144.
10. Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, Helmrich SP, Shapiro S. The risk of myocardial infarction after quitting smoking in men under 55 years of age. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1511-1514.
11. Tverdal A, Thelle D, Stensvold I, et al. Mortality in relation to smoking history: 13 years' follow-up of 68,000 Norwegian men and women 35-49 years. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:475-587.
12. Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. Smoking cessation in relation to total mortality rates in women. A prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:992-1000.
13. Fletcher C, Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Br Med J. 1977;1:1645-1648.
14. Anthonisen NR, Connett JE, Kiley JP, et al. Effects of smoking intervention and the use of an in-haled anticholinergic bronchodilator on the rate of decline of FEV1. The Lung Health Study. JAMA. 1994; 272:1497-1505.
15. Samet JM. The health benefits of smoking cessation. Med Clin North Am. 1992;76:399-414.
16. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Dis-orders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
17. Fagerstrom KO. Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav. 1978;3: 235-241.
18. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119-1127.
19. Henningfield JE. Nicotine medications for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1196-1203.
20. Etter JF, Duc TV, Perneger TV. Validity of the Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence and of the Heaviness of Smoking Index among relatively light smokers. Addiction. 1999;94:269-281.
21. Mallin R. Smoking cessation: integration of behavioral and drug therapies. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65:1107-1114.
22. Hughes JR, Hatsukami D. Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43: 289-294.
23. Hughes JR. Tobacco withdrawal in self-quitters. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:689-697.
24. Gritz ER, Carr CR, Marcus AC. The tobacco withdrawal syndrome in unaided quitters. Br J Addict. 1991;86:57-69.
25. The Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Panel and Staff. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Smoking Cessation Clinical Practice Guideline. JAMA. 1996;275:1270-1280.
26. Slama K, Redman S, Perkins J, et al. The effectiveness of two smoking cessation programmes for use in general practice: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 1990;300:1707-1709.
27. Demers RY, Neale AV, Adams R, et al. The impact of physicians' brief smoking cessation counseling: a MIRNET study. J Fam Pract. 1990;31:625-629.
28. Pederson LL, Wanklin JM, Lefcoe NM. The effects of counseling on smoking cessation among patients hospitalized with chronic obstructive pulmo- nary disease: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Addict. 1991;26:107-119.
29. Wadland WC, Soffelmayr B, Ives K. Enhancing smoking cessation of low-income smokers in managed care. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:138-144.
30. Okuyemi KS, Ahluwalia JS, Harris KJ. Pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:270-281.
31. Helge TD, Denelsky GY. Pharmacologic aids to smoking cessation. Cleve Clin J Med. 2000;67:818, 821-824.
32. Garvey AJ, Kinnunen T, Nordstrom BL, et al. Effects of nicotine gum dose by level of nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2000;2:53-63.
33. ICRF General Practice Research Group. Randomized trial of nicotine patches in general practice: results at one year. BMJ. 1994;308:1476-1477.
34. Fiore MC, Smith SS, Jorenby DE, Baker TB. The effectiveness of the nicotine patch for smoking cessation. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;271:1940-1947.
35. Daughton DM, Fortmann SP, Glover ED, et al. The smoking cessation efficacy of varying doses of nicotine patch delivery systems 4 to 5 years post-quit day. Prev Med. 1999;28:113-118.
36. Shiffman S, Elash CA, Paton SM, et al. Comparative efficacy of 24-hour and 16-hour transdermal nicotine patches for relief of morning craving. Addiction. 2000;95:1185-1195.
37. Dale LC, Hurt RD, Offord KP, et al. High-dose nicotine patch therapy. Percentage of replacement and smoking cessation. JAMA. 1995;274:1353-1358.
38. Fredrickson PA, Hurt RD, Lee GM, et al. High-dose transdermal nicotine therapy for heavy smokers: safety, tolerability and measurement of nicotine and cotinine levels. Psychopharmacology. 1995;122: 215-222.
39. Fiore MC, Kenford SL, Jorenby DE, et al. Two studies of the clinical effectiveness of the nicotine patch with different counseling treatments. Chest. 1994;105:524-533.
40. Paoletti P, Fornai E, Maggiorelli F, et al. Importance of baseline cotinine plasma values in smoking cessation: results from a double-blind study with nicotine patch. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:643-651.
41. Schneider NG, Lunell E, Olmstead RE, Fagerstrom KO. Clinical pharmacokinetics of nasal nicotine delivery. A review and comparison to other nicotine systems. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996;31:65-80.
42. Sutherland G, Stapleton JA, Russell MA, et al. Randomised controlled trial of nasal nicotine spray in smoking cessation. Lancet. 1992;340:324-329.
43. Hjalmarson A, Nilsson F, Sjostrom L, Wiklund O. The nicotine inhaler in smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1721-1728.
44. Schneider NG, Olmstead R, Nilsson F, et al. Efficacy of a nicotine inhaler in smoking cessation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Addiction. 1996;91:1293-1306.
45. Settle EC Jr. Bupropion sustained release: side effect profile. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(suppl 4):32-36.
46. Hurt RD, Sachs DP, Glover ED, et al. A comparison of sustained-release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1195-1202.
47. Hajek P, West R, Foulds J, et al. Randomized comparative trial of nicotine polacrilex, a transdermal patch, nasal spray, and an inhaler. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2033-2038.
48. West R, Hajek P, Nilsson F, et al. Individual differences in preferences for and responses to four nicotine replacement products. Psychopharmacology. 2001;153:225-230.
49. Joseph AM, Norman SM, Ferry LH, et al. The safety of transdermal nicotine as an aid to smoking cessation in patients with cardiac disease. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1792-1798.
50. Nicotine replacement therapy for patients with coronary artery disease. Working Group for the Study of Transdermal Nicotine in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154: 989-995.
51. Jorenby DE, Leischow SJ, Nides MA, et al. A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:685-691.
52. Kornitzer M, Boutsen M, Dramaix M, et al. Combined use of nicotine patch and gum in smoking cessation: a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Prev Med. 1995;24:41-47.
53. Blondal T, Gudmundsson LJ, Olafsdottir I, et al. Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up. BMJ. 1999;318:285-288.
54. Aakko E, Piasecki TM, Remington P, Fiore MC. Smoking cessation services offered by health insurance plans for Wisconsin state employees. WMJ. 1999;98:14-18.
55. Curry SJ, Grothaus LC, McAfee T, Pabiniak C. Use and cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation services under four insurance plans in a health maintenance organization. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:673-679.
56. Shiffman S, Gitchell J, Pinney JM, et al. Public health benefit of over-the-counter nicotine medications. Tob Control. 1997;6:306-310.
57. Medlineplus Health Information. Smoking cessation. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ medlineplus/smokingcessation.html. Accessed April 24, 2003.