• Heart Failure
  • Cardiovascular Clinical Consult
  • Adult Immunization
  • Hepatic Disease
  • Rare Disorders
  • Pediatric Immunization
  • Implementing The Topcon Ocular Telehealth Platform
  • Weight Management
  • Monkeypox
  • Guidelines
  • Men's Health
  • Psychiatry
  • Allergy
  • Nutrition
  • Women's Health
  • Cardiology
  • Substance Use
  • Pediatrics
  • Kidney Disease
  • Genetics
  • Complimentary & Alternative Medicine
  • Dermatology
  • Endocrinology
  • Oral Medicine
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
  • Pain
  • Gastrointestinal Disorders
  • Geriatrics
  • Infection
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Obesity
  • Rheumatology
  • Technology
  • Cancer
  • Nephrology
  • Anemia
  • Neurology
  • Pulmonology

Study Finds COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibody Response Differs by Vaccine Type

Study Finds COVID-19 Neutralizing Antibody Response Differs by Vaccine Type

Vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus remains the most critical tool for controlling the spread of COVID-19 infection. The neutralizing antibody (nAB) response induced by vaccination is strongly correlated with protection against COVID-19, but protection has been shown to wane over time, and there are individual differences in sustained immune protection.

A head-to-head comparison study, published May 9 in Scientific Reports, sought to identify individual factors that influence the decline in nABs and understand the impact of COVID-19 vaccine type on nAB response durability.

This study investigated the durability of neutralizing antibodies (nABs) in healthy community volunteers who received 1 of 3 COVID-19 vaccines: Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), Moderna (mRNA-1273), and Janssen (Ad26.COV2.S). The study enrolled 498 healthy participants who completed questionnaires and blood draws before vaccination, as well as at 1 month and 6 months after vaccination. nAB titers were quantified using high throughput pseudovirus assay.

One month after vaccination, Pfizer-BioNTech recipients had an antibody response 21 times higher than those who received the Janssen shot, while response among Moderna recipients was 51 times higher than the Janssen cohort.

However, the results showed that nABs declined over the 6 months of follow-up for recipients of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, while the nABs in Janssen recipients increased significantly. At the 6-month time point, nABs to Janssen were significantly higher than nABs to Pfizer-BioNTech and equivalent to Moderna. Older age was associated with lower nABs for participants who received Pfizer-BioNTech and Janssen, but not for those who received Moderna.

A higher baseline body mass index (BMI) was associated with lower nABs for Janssen recipients, but this trend did not apply to patients who received other vaccines. Women and non-smokers showed higher nABs compared to men and current smokers, respectively.

The study’s findings suggest that the durability of nAB responses differs by vaccine type and several sociodemographic factors. However, the study’s limitations should be noted, including a relatively small sample size for some vaccine types, the absence of data on T-cell immunity, and the use of a pseudovirus assay to measure nAB titers.

Overall, this study contributes to the understanding the nAB response durability of and the impact of vaccine type and individual factors on vaccine efficacy. These findings can inform public health decisions around booster recommendations and vaccine deployment strategies.

Reference: Prather AA, Dutcher EG, Robinson J, et al. Predictors of long-term neutralizing antibody titers following COVID-19 vaccination by three vaccine types: the BOOST study. Sci Rep. 2023;13:6505. Published online May 9, 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33320-x

Related Videos
"Vaccination is More of a Marathon than a Sprint"
Vaccines are for Kids, Booster Fatigue, and Other Obstacles to Adult Immunization
Document COVID Sequelae and Primary Care: An Interview with Samoon Ahmad, MD
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.