US Counties With Low Screening See Higher Cervical Cancer Death Rates: Daily Dose

Fact checked by Grace Halsey
News
Article
 US Counties With Low Screening See Higher Cervical Cancer Death Rates: Daily Dose / Image Credit: ©New Africa/AdobeStock
©New Africa/AdobeStock

Patient Care brings primary care clinicians a lot of medical news every day—it’s easy to miss an important study. The Daily Dose provides a concise summary of one of the website's leading stories you may not have seen.


On August 13, 2025, we reported on a study published in JAMA Network Open that examined differences in cervical cancer incidence and mortality by county-level screening in the US.

The study

Researchers analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)–22 database to identify cervical cancer cases in women aged ≥20 years from 2016 to 2021 (excluding 2020). Mortality data came from the National Center for Health Statistics. County-level screening coverage estimates were derived from SEER small area data for 1086 counties. Counties were classified as “repeat low coverage” (<70% screening during 2011–2016 and at least 1 earlier period), “repeat high coverage” (≥80% in both periods), or “other.” The <70% threshold is nearly 10 percentage points below the national target of 79.2%, while the ≥80% threshold exceeds national benchmarks.

The findings

Of the counties analyzed, 70 were repeat low coverage, 141 were repeat high coverage, and 875 were other. Most low-coverage counties were rural (87.1%) with median household incomes <$75 000, while most high-coverage counties were urban (84.4%) and more than half had median incomes ≥$75 000. Nearly half of the repeat low coverage counties were in Texas, with others concentrated in Idaho and New Mexico.

Compared with high-coverage counties, cervical cancer incidence was 28% higher in “other” counties (rate ratio [RR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.25–1.31) and 83% higher in low-coverage counties (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.67–2.00). Mortality was 42% higher in “other” counties (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.35–1.50) and 96% higher in low-coverage counties (RR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.66–2.30).

Authors' comments

"Our study findings underscore the urgent need to improve cervical cancer screening in rural and lower-income counties. Particularly, counties where screening coverage is repeatedly low should be targeted."

Click here for more details.


Newsletter

Enhance your clinical practice with the Patient Care newsletter, offering the latest evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic insights, and treatment strategies for primary care physicians.

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.