
News|Articles|December 11, 2025
AI-Powered Diabetes Prevention Program Intervention Matches Human Coaching: Daily Dose
Author(s)Sydney Jennings
Fact checked by: Grace Halsey
Your daily dose of the clinical news you may have missed.
Advertisement
Patient Care brings primary care clinicians a lot of medical news every day—it’s easy to miss an important study. The Daily Dose provides a concise summary of one of the website's leading stories you may not have seen.
On October 27, 2025, we reported on findings from a study published in JAMA that was designed to determine whether referral to an exclusively artificial intelligence (AI)–led lifestyle intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is noninferior to referral to a human-led DPP.
The study
For the parallel-group, pragmatic noninferiority trial, conducted from October 2021 to December 2024, researchers enrolled 368 middle-aged adults (median age 58 years) with prediabetes and overweight or obesity from 2 US clinical sites in Maryland and Pennsylvania. The cohort was 71% women; 61% self-identified as White, 27% as Black, and 6% as Hispanic.
Participants were randomly assigned to receive referral to either a fully automated AI-powered DPP mobile app powered by reinforcement learning algorithms or 1 of 4 CDC-recognized human coach-led programs. A critical component of the study, according to the authors, the research team did not promote engagement after referral, following up only at 6 and 12 months to assess real-world effectiveness.
The primary composite outcome required maintaining HbA1c below 6.5% throughout the study plus achieving at least one of the following:
5% weight loss
4% weight loss combined with 150 minutes of weekly moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Absolute HbA1c reduction of 0.2 percentage points
The findings
Results showed that 31.7% of participants referred to the AI-powered program and 31.9% referred to human coaching met CDC benchmarks for diabetes risk reduction at 12 months, a difference that met the prespecified criterion for noninferiority. Notably, the AI program demonstrated higher rates of both initiation (93.4% vs 82.7%) and completion (63.9% vs 50.3%) compared with traditional programs.
Authors' comments
"Among adults with prediabetes and overweight or obesity, referral to a fully automated AI-led DPP was noninferior to referral to a human-led DPP in achieving a composite outcome based on weight reduction, physical activity, and HbA1c."
Newsletter
Enhance your clinical practice with the Patient Care newsletter, offering the latest evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic insights, and treatment strategies for primary care physicians.
Advertisement
Latest CME
Advertisement
Advertisement
Trending on Patient Care Online
1
FDA Opens Safety Review of RSV Monoclonal Antibodies Used in Infants
2
ADA Publishes 2026 Standards of Care With Updates to Sections on Technology, Obesity, Cardiometabolic Disease Management
3
New AHS Emergency Department Migraine Guideline Elevates Prochlorperazine and Nerve Blocks, Advises Again Against Opioids
4
New 5-Minute Test Accurately Distinguishes HIV Infection from Vaccine-Induced False Positives
5



















































































































































































































































































