
WHO Safety Panel Updates Evidence Review, Confirms Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism
WHO experts weighed decades of high-quality studies against flawed analyses, finding consistent evidence that current vaccines pose no autism-related risk.
The World Health Organization’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) has again concluded that
GACVS bases its determinations on established criteria for causality, with particular emphasis on study design and risk of bias. "We place the greatest weight on high-quality, well-designed studies with low risk of bias, and very little weight on studies with significant methodological flaws,” the committee wrote. Systematic reviews, which evaluate the quality of all available studies and synthesize results, form the foundation of this process.
Review of Thimerosal and Vaccines in General
The first new review updated earlier WHO analyses published in 2012 and included 31 primary studies and 5 meta-analyses from 11 countries. The majority of the methodologically strongest studies, including all meta-analyses, found no association between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and either
“Although a small number of studies suggested a potential link, these studies had major methodological limitations and provided very low-quality evidence that cannot support causality,” the GACVS noted. The committee also emphasized that many of the studies suggesting harm originated from a single research group and consistently exhibited high risk of bias.
Review of Aluminium-Adjuvanted Vaccines
The second systematic review evaluated whether aluminium-containing vaccines pose long-term health risks, including neurodevelopmental outcomes. High-quality evidence from randomized trials and large cohort studies
Two ecological analyses had reported correlations between cumulative aluminium exposure and ASD prevalence, but GACVS emphasized that such study designs "are not not suited to determining causality, and each was judged at critical risk of bias.”
As part of its assessment, GACVS also considered a
GACVS reaffirmed the conclusions of its prior reviews, first established in 2002 and updated in 2004 and 2012: “The totality of high-quality scientific evidence continues to support the safety of vaccines containing thiomersal, aluminium, or both, with no indication of increased risk for autism,” the committee stated.
The committee highlighted that decades of research from multiple countries continue to support the strong safety profile of vaccines used in pregnancy and childhood.
Newsletter
Enhance your clinical practice with the Patient Care newsletter, offering the latest evidence-based guidelines, diagnostic insights, and treatment strategies for primary care physicians.



















































































































































































































































































