
Panelists discuss how teplizumab infusion requires specialized medical facilities equipped to manage intravenous therapy, monitor for potential adverse effects, and provide appropriate care during treatment to ensure patient safety and efficacy.

Panelists discuss how teplizumab infusion requires specialized medical facilities equipped to manage intravenous therapy, monitor for potential adverse effects, and provide appropriate care during treatment to ensure patient safety and efficacy.

Panelists discuss how teplizumab, an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, delays the onset and progression of type 1 diabetes by modulating immune response and preserving ß-cell function in high-risk individuals.

Panelists discuss screening for T1D for individuals at higher risk, such as those with a family history of T1D, autoimmune conditions, or certain genetic markers, to identify early signs of the disease and enable timely intervention.

Panelists discuss how antibody screening tests for type 1 diabetes (T1D), including tests for insulin autoantibodies (IAA), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies, and other markers can help identify individuals at risk for developing the disease before clinical symptoms appear, enabling earlier monitoring and potential intervention.

Panelists discuss how delaying intervention in stage 2 type 1 diabetes, when dysglycemia is present but clinical symptoms have not yet developed, can lead to further ß-cell deterioration and worsen long-term glycemic control, ultimately increasing the risk of complications.

Panelists discuss how the progression of type 1 diabetes unfolds through distinct stages, from the preclinical phase of autoimmunity to the onset of clinical diabetes, emphasizing the importance of early detection and intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Panelists discuss how adhering to screening guidelines for type 1 diabetes enables early detection and intervention, improving patient outcomes and delaying disease progression through timely treatments like teplizumab.

Panelists discuss how managing the clinical, financial, and quality-of-life burdens of type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires early intervention, proactive care strategies, and the use of treatments like teplizumab to improve patient outcomes and reduce long-term complications.

Panelists discuss how antibody screening for type 1 diabetes can identify at-risk individuals early, enabling proactive monitoring and intervention to delay or prevent disease onset.

Panelists discuss how teplizumab therapy can delay the onset and progression of type 1 diabetes (T1D) by preserving β-cell function and reducing the risk of developing full-blown diabetes in at-risk individuals.

Panelists discuss clinical use of teplizumab including patient selection, navigating approval processes, and managing the 14-day infusion regimen to optimize outcomes and delay the progression of type 1 diabetes.

Our network connects providers, health plans, and life science companies to deliver seamless care that benefits everyone

Panelists discuss how delaying intervention between stage II and stage III T1D can result in irreversible β-cell loss, higher rates of complications, and poorer overall outcomes for patients.

Panelists discuss how understanding the stages of type 1 diabetes (T1D) progression is crucial for early intervention, with a focus on delaying disease advancement through proactive treatments like teplizumab.

Panelists discuss how delaying intervention in stage 2 T1D can lead to faster disease progression, increased risk of complications like diabetic ketoacidosis, and greater long-term burden on patient health and quality of life.

Panelists highlight the burden of type 1 diabetes including the significant physical, emotional, and financial challenges faced by patients and their families, emphasizing the need for early intervention and proactive management strategies.

Panelists discuss strategies for simplifying complex information for primary care physicians (PCPs), provide tips on how PCPs can effectively communicate evidence-based treatment options to patients, and outline actionable points and key takeaways to enhance patient care in managing menopause symptoms.

Panelists discuss alternative therapies for women who are not candidates for or choose not to use hormonal therapy, review nonhormonal treatment options recommended by the North American Menopause Society, and explore the growing importance of Level I evidence and consensus opinions in creating a more holistic view of available therapies, both hormonal and nonhormonal.

Panelists discuss key considerations for women taking hormonal therapy, emphasizing the importance of individualized treatment plans and shared decision-making to evaluate the risk-benefit profile of therapy.

Panelists discuss clinical trial data suggesting a small but higher incidence of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy with fezolinetant, while no cases of endometrial hyperplasia or malignancy were observed with elinzanetant in a long-term safety study.

Panelists discuss why elinzanetant is likely to be associated with a lower risk of liver injury due to its distinct molecular structure compared to fezolinetant, and compare the adverse event profiles of the 2 drugs, highlighting that elinzanetant is more commonly associated with headache and fatigue while fezolinetant is linked to abdominal pain, diarrhea, insomnia, and back pain.

Panelists discuss why a warning about serious liver injury was added to the prescribing information for fezolinetant following a postmarketing case of drug-induced liver injury, and review updated guidelines for baseline liver testing, recommended monitoring, symptoms indicating the need to discontinue the medication, and key points for addressing patient concerns about liver health.

Panelists discuss how to simplify the physiology of KNDy neurons and neurokinin (NK) receptors for primary care physicians, explaining how NK3 antagonism reduces hot flashes, while NK1 antagonism helps alleviate sleep disturbances and night sweats, with fezolinetant and elinzanetant serving as key nonhormonal treatment options.

Panelists discuss how neurokinin 3 (NK3) receptors contribute to vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and how antagonism of NK3 receptors with drugs like fezolinetant can effectively reduce VMS, while also exploring the dual receptor action of elinzanetant, which blocks both NK1 and NK3 receptors to improve VMS and associated sleep disturbances.

Panelists discuss how KNDy neurons, which coexpress kisspeptin, neurokinin B (NKB), and dynorphin genes, play a crucial role in hormonal reproduction and the development of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) in menopause.

Geriatric psychiatrist and neurocognitive researcher George Grossberg, MD, highlights the mechanism of action for the new dextromethorphan/bupropion combination.

William Grady, MD, coauthor of the ECLIPSE clinical trial, discusses the study's rationale, methods, and key findings.

ACIP recommendations for the most appropriate older population for the RSV vaccine has shifted and the NFID medical director explains why.

Rebecca Hartman, MD, MHP, assistant professor of dermatology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, reviews new point-of-care detection technology.

Topical corticosteroids, once revolutionary for treatment of atopic dermatitis, are used just sparingly today; dermatologist Mona Shahriari, MD, lists the reasons.